Supabase vs. Keycloak: Your SaaS’ Best Auth

Intro

What Are We Choosing Between?

In simple terms, we’re comparing two authentication solutions that help you handle who gets access to your app and what they can do inside it. Both Supabase and Keycloak let you manage users and control access to resources, but how they do it, and for who, can vary a lot.

Who Are You Building For?

Before diving into the nitty-gritty, it’s important to consider who your audience is. Are you building a B2C (business-to-consumer) SaaS platform or an enterprise-grade B2B app? This question matters because Supabase and Keycloak are optimized for different types of users.

Supabase vs. Keycloak(Preview)

Feature Supabase Keycloak
Core Features Basic IAM (authentication, authorization, user management ) Advanced IAM (SSO, identity brokering, user federation, social login, MFA)
Ease of Use Simple, user-friendly setup More complex, steeper learning curve
Hosting Model Managed, serverless, or self-hosted Self-hosted or hybrid deployment options
Architecture Microservices-friendly, lightweight Comprehensive, robust, enterprise-grade
User Interface Intuitive, user-friendly Powerful but may require more time to master
Authorization RLS in PostgreSQL Advanced and highly flexible
Scalability Good for small to medium apps Excellent for large, enterprise apps
Compliance Best-effort data security Strong compliance, enterprise-grade security and auditing tools
Multi-Tenancy Basic (needs manual configuration) Native realm-based separation
Integration Lightweight; consumer-first services Heavy integration with enterprise systems
Customization Predefined workflows; minimal effort Extensive customization options; extra effort
Enterprise Integration Limited (external IdPs required) Native support for AD, LDAP, SAML
Social Logins Out-of-the-box support for OAuth providers Supported but requires more manual setup


Image Not Found

I. Keycloak: The Ops Friendly

Keycloak is the heavyweight in this comparison. Built for enterprise-grade security, Keycloak offers robust features like Single Sign-On (SSO), identity brokering, and deep role-based access control (RBAC). It is an open-source Identity and Access Management tool that provides robust features for managing user authentication and authorization. It is widely used in SaaS architectures due to its flexibility, scalability, and support for modern authentication standards.

📒Documentation: Keycloack guides

Why Keycloak is Suitable for Your SaaS

1. Support for Modern Protocols

Keycloak supports modern authentication protocols essential for features like single sign-on (SSO), and token-based authentication for APIs like:

  • OAuth2 and OpenID Connect (OIDC) for secure user login and authorization flows.
  • SAML for integrating with enterprise identity providers.

2. Multi-Tenancy Support

In a SaaS environment, where different organizations (tenants) access your application:

  • Keycloak allows you to configure realms, which are isolated spaces for managing users, roles, and clients.
  • Each tenant can have its own realm, making it easier to segregate authentication data.

3. Flexible User Federation

Keycloak can integrate with external user stores, if your SaaS needs to support existing user bases or enterprise clients with their own identity providers. such as:

  • LDAP or Active Directory.
  • Database user tables.


4. Built-in Features

Keycloak provides many features out-of-the-box, saving development time:

  • Login Pages: Fully customizable templates for your SaaS branding.
  • Role-Based Access Control (RBAC): Manage permissions at a fine-grained level.
  • Social Login: Support for third-party login via Google, Facebook, GitHub, etc.
  • Session Management: Handle user sessions effectively with idle and max session limits.


5. Extendibility

For additional functionalities. Keycloak can be extended via Custom SPI (Service Provider Interfaces) & its REST API for managing users, sessions, and tokens.

Keyloack Integration with Your SaaS

To integrate Keycloak into your SaaS

1. Deployment Options

  • Host it yourself: Use Docker, Kubernetes, or OCI to deploy Keycloak.
  • Managed Services: Some cloud providers and third parties offer hosted Keycloak solutions.

2. Connect Your App:

  • Register your SaaS application as a client in Keycloak.
  • Configure the redirect URIs for login and logout.
  • Use Keycloak’s OIDC SDKs or REST APIs to handle authentication in your app.

3. Secure Your APIs

  • Protect your backend endpoints using Bearer Tokens issued by Keycloak.
  • Validate tokens in your backend to restrict access to authenticated users.

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Enterprise-Grade Features Supports Active Directory, LDAP, SAML, OIDC, Kerberos, SSO, MFA, and social logins.
  • Granular Authorization Offers flexible user roles, permissions, and fine-grained access control.
  • Multi-Tenancy Handles multi-tenancy with realm-based user and resource separation.
  • Customization Allows highly customizable workflows, themes, and extensions.
  • Open Source and Vendor-Neutral Can be deployed on any infrastructure, avoiding vendor lock-in.

Cons

  • Complex Setup Steeper learning curve and harder configuration compared to simpler solutions.
  • Resource-Intensive Requires significant compute and memory resources, especially at scale.
  • Overhead for Small Apps Not ideal for simple use cases or small-scale SaaS applications.
  • Maintenance Requires ongoing updates, patches, and scaling management for self-hosted deployments.



II. Supabase: The Startup Hero

Image Not Found

Supabase is an open-source backend-as-a-service (BaaS) that’s often called the “open-source Firebase alternative”. It’s ideal for developers who need an easy way to handle authentication without the complexity. Supabase offers a fully managed authentication system that integrates OAuth, social logins, and even email/password authentication. Its easy-to-use UI and seamless integrations with Google, GitHub, and other social media providers.

Supabase is built with developers in mind designed for rapid development, offering a rich developer experience with clear documentation, intuitive UI, and rapid development capabilities.

📒Documentation: Auth guides

Why Supabase is Suitable for Your SaaS

1. Ease of Use and Quick Setup

Supabase is perfect for developers looking to launch a SaaS quickly. It provides a simple, out-of-the-box authentication solution with minimal configuration and pre-built UI components.

2. Integrated Backend:

Combines authentication with a powerful PostgreSQL backend and real-time APIs for seamless data management and user authentication.

4. Real-Time Features

Supabase supports real-time subscriptions, making it easy to build apps that need real-time user session updates or collaborative features.

5. Role-Based Access Control (RBAC)

Supabase offers RBAC tied directly to the database rows through PostgreSQL Row-Level Security (RLS). This allows fine-grained access control, ensuring that only the right users have access to specific data based on their roles.


6. Multi-Tenancy (Basic)

Supabase supports basic multi-tenancy through schema separation and role segregation at the database level. This allows you to segregate user data by tenants, even though it might not offer the same isolation as a Keycloak realm.

7. Support All the social providers

Enable social logins with a click of a button. Google, Facebook, GitHub, Azure, Gitlab, Twitter, Discord, and more.
All user data (accounts, access policies, etc…) is stored and managed in the database backend.

Image Not Found

See Supabase CEO‘s Auth presentation below…

Supabase Integration with Your SaaS

Adding Supabase to your SaaS application is a straightforward process:

  1. Deployment Options
    • Fully Managed Hosting: Supabase handles infrastructure, offering a fully hosted platform.
    • Self-Hosting: Supabase is also deployable via Docker or Kubernetes.
  2. Sign Up and Set Up a Project: Create a project on Supabase and configure your authentication settings.
  3. Connect Frontend & Backend: Use the client library to link your app’s frontend to its authentication & DB services.
  4. Customize Authentication: Set up social logins, email/password, or magic link authentication.
  5. Implement Access Control: Leverage PostgreSQL’s row-level security (RLS) to enforce RBAC to your app’s data.
  6. Enhance : Enable live session updates or real-time event triggers for enhanced user experience.

Pros & Cons

Pros:

  • Ease of Use: Quick setup with minimal configuration and built-in UI components for authentication.
  • Integrated Backend: Seamless integration with Supabase DB & real-time APIs, with (RBAC) tied to Database rows.
  • Real-Time Features: Supports real-time data subscriptions for live user session updates.
  • Rapid Development: Ideal for startups and small apps needing quick deployment, with a rich developer experience.
  • Basic Multi-Tenancy: Achievable through database schema configuration and role segregation.

Cons

  • Limited Enterprise Features: No native support for Active Directory, SAML, or LDAP, requiring custom integrations.
  • Authorization Complexity: Advanced authorization workflows, like hierarchical roles, are harder to implement.
  • Scalability Concerns: Not optimized for very high-scale, enterprise-grade use cases.
  • No advanced Multi-Tenancy and no dynamic schemas support
  • Vendor Lock-In: Tightly coupled to the Supabase ecosystem, limiting portability.

Summary

Audience-Based Comparison

Factor Supabase (B2C/Startup Focus) Keycloak (B2B/Enterprise Focus)
Audience Startups, consumer-facing apps, mobile/web apps Enterprises, B2B SaaS, internal business apps
Community Active, but smaller community Large, active community with extensive docs
Support Community-driven support Professional support available from Red Hat

Choose Supabase If:

  • You’re building a B2C startup targeting end-users who prefer social logins.(e.g., consumer platforms).
  • You need a quick, simple, and affordable authentication solution with prebuilt UI widgets.
  • Your app doesn’t require enterprise IAM features like AD integration or multi-tenancy.
  • You’re already using Supabase for backend and database services.
  • Your app operates in an environment where social logins (Google, Facebook, GitHub) are common

Choose Keycloak If:

  • You are an enterprise with complex IAM requirements and a growing user base..
  • Your organization requires enterprise-grade authentication solution (AD, LDAP, or SAML).
  • Your organization requires Identity Brokering, User Federation, and MFA.
  • You need a highly scalable, enterprise-grade IAM solution.
  • Security and compliance are top priorities for regulated industries.
  • Your application demands multi-tenancy support and customizable workflows.
  • You have a technical team to manage and configure an advanced IAM system.

Final Thoughts

Choosing the right IAM solution depends on your organization’s size, security needs, and authentication complexity:

If your SaaS application is geared toward larger regulated organizations or complex authentication, Keycloak is the way to go. For straightforward use cases or rapid deployment for Fast time-to-market, Supabase wins.

Note: We might extend this review series to other solutions in the future (i.e Authelia, Authentic ..)

Stay Tuned!

Share this…

Don't miss a Bit!

Join countless others!
Sign up and get awesome cloud content straight to your inbox. 🚀

Start your Cloud journey with us today .